In addition, a judge may give other remedies to compensate the non-injurious party, such as removing contractual obligations or rewriting the terms of the contract. B, to include new changes and updates. It is therefore important that the treaty be developed with great care first and that it be thoroughly reviewed before it is signed. If the law has requirements for one type of contract, they are usually that the agreement is registered in writing and signed by one or both parties or their agent. 1) According to the theory of well-being, there is only a reasonable consideration if a promise is made in the benefit of the promise or at the expense of the promise that prompts the promise of something else for the beneficiary of the promise. For example, promises that are not pure gifts are not considered enforceable, as the personal satisfaction that the donor can obtain from the promise by the act of generosity is generally not considered a sufficient inconvenience to obtain adequate consideration. 2) Under the idea of a good deal for exchange, there is appropriate thinking when a promisor makes a promise in exchange for something else. Here is the essential condition that the promisor was given something specifically to induce the promise made. In other words, the theory of good deal for exchange differs from the theory of damage-benefit by the fact that the centre of gravity of the theory of the exchange of parties seems to be the reason for making the promises and subjective mutual consent of the parties, while the emphasis on damage-benefit theory seems to be an objective legal disadvantage or an advantage for the parties. These provisions apply subject to the contrary agreement. For a contract to be considered legally binding, all the following criteria must be met: after all, a modern concern, which has increased in contract law, is the increasing use of a particular type of contract called a “contract” or “formality contract”. This type of contract may be beneficial to some parties, due to the convenience and ability of the strong party in a case to force the terms of the contract to a weaker party.

For example, mortgage contracts, leases, online sales or notification contracts, etc. In some cases, the courts consider these membership contracts with particular scrutiny because of the possibility of unequal bargaining power, injustice and unacceptable.